Formal and informal acts from authorities that restrict civil society participation in the public administration
Despite being provided for in the Constitution at different stages of the public policy cycle, popular participation in the public administration has been systematically undermined. This weakening is leveraged by authorities with hostile speeches against NGOs (labelled as ‘cancer[igenous]’ and ‘Shiites’ by the president) and becomes real by decrees, ordinances and other regulations, which extinguish councils and working groups, change compositional frameworks and reduce or even eliminate seats for university and NGO representatives.
One of the first acts of President Jair Bolsonaro on January 1st 2021 was to issue an Emergency Decree allowing the Government Secretariat of Government to carry out the supervision and monitoring of the activities of international organizations and NGOs. Although the measure was hindered by the strong social counter response, it has already signaled the type of relationship that the president seeks to establish with these civic actors. Another wide-ranging formal measure taken by Bolsonaro against the presence of civil society materialized in April 2019, by means of a decree extinguishing collegiate bodies from the federal public administration that were not established by law. At least 734 spaces for participation were affected. Among the bodies struck by these formal measures, we can mention:
Constitutional provision
The Brazilian democratization process after 20 years of military dictatorship was marked by intense social mobilization with the ‘Diretas Já’ (‘Direct Elections Now’) campaign and also by demands from civil society, who fought to partake in the constitution-making process. The 1988 Brazilian Constitution is seminal as it inaugurated the democratic period. struggled to guarantee its participation in the process of writing the Constitution that inaugurated the democratic period. LAUT researcher Natália Neris explains that due to these actors’ political mobilization the Constituent Assembly incorporated mechanisms of popular participation. Among these mechanisms, we can mention: the holding of public hearings, the creation of popular amendments, and the possibility for social movements to forward suggestions for the then emerging constitutional text.
The 1988 Constitution foresees:
Contrary to these recommendations, the formal and informal measures registered in the timeline below undermine mechanisms for popular participation in public administration.
Read more about this episode here – in Portuguese [find out here] and news related to it [1]
Read more about it here – in Portuguese [1] [find out here], about the curtailment of civil society participation in Brazil [2] and about the Supreme Court (‘STF’) decision limiting the presidential decree [3]
Read about about this event here – in Portuguese [find out here]. The tendency to reduce civil society participation is also present in Bolsonaro Administration [1] [2]
Read more about it here [1], about the National Council for Children and Youth Rights here [2] and about children’s right in Brazil here [3]. Also remind past occasion when civil society participation was also curtailed in the National Drug Policies Council here [find out here]
Read more about the oil spill accident here [1] [2] and about this episode – in Portuguese [find out here]
Read study by specialized NGO about the government’s environmental policy in 2020 [1]. Find out more about this specific episode – in Portuguese [find out here]